High Court rules Transport Secretary Grant Shapps acted unlawfully when granting permission for the Stonehenge tunnel scheme.
- Campaigners challenged Grant Shapps’ decision to approve controversial plans
- He gave go-ahead in November despite concerns it would damage UNESCO site
- But a judge said there was no impact assessment or alternative proposals
- The tunnel is part of a £27billion masterplan to improve the nation’s roads
The £1.7bn Highways England project aims to reduce A303 congestion but campaigners said it would detrimentally affect the world heritage site.
The government approved plans in 2020 for a two-mile (3.2km) tunnel to be created near the Wiltshire monument.
Those opposed to the plans brought a judicial review on the basis the project had been approved unlawfully.
Highways England said it wanted to build the tunnel to reduce traffic and cut journey times on the A303, which is the most direct route for motorists travelling between the South East and South West and is used by thousands of people daily.
The SSWHS Judgement published today can be read on the Stonehenge Alliance website here
STONEHENGE TUNNEL CAMPAIGN IN THE NEWS:
Stonehenge tunnel campaigners win court battle – BBC News
Campaigners WIN High Court battle over ‘unlawful’ £1.7 billion two-mile Stonehenge tunnel project – Daily Mail
A303 Stonehenge tunnel scheme ‘unlawful’ High Court rules – Salisbury Journal
Campaigners win High Court victory over Stonehenge tunnel project – MSN
Stonehenge road and tunnel decision unlawful, rules judge – Leigh Day
High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel is ruled unlawful – The Guardian
Stonehenge tunnel project blocked as campaigners win High Court battle – ITV
The Stonehenge News Blog
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for all the latest Stonehenge News
http://www.Stonehenge.News